Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] site: faq: don't refer to GNU Boot images as ROMs.

[Adrien 'neox' Bourmault]

Le dimanche 12 mai 2024 à 23:36 +0200, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli a écrit :
> From: DiffieHellman <DiffieHellman@endianness.com>
> 
> One of the definitions of ROM is read-only-memory. Because of that it
> creates confusion when this term is used to refer to an image that
> is to be installed on a writable storage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: DiffieHellman <DiffieHellman@endianness.com>
> GNUtoo: split commit, commit message.
> Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
> ---
>  site/faq.md | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/site/faq.md b/site/faq.md
> index 489e0b8..1b9eea0 100644
> --- a/site/faq.md
> +++ b/site/faq.md
> 
> [...]
>  
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ the VBIOS (special kind of OptionROM) is usually embedded
>  in the main boot firmware. For external graphics, the VBIOS is
>  usually on the graphics card itself. This is usually proprietary; the
>  only difference is that SeaBIOS can execute it (alternatively, you embed it
> -in a coreboot ROM image and have coreboot executes it, if you use a
> +in a coreboot image and have coreboot executes it, if you use a
>  different payload, such as GRUB).
>  
>  On current GNU Boot systems, instead of VBIOS, coreboot native GPU init is
> used,

It seems again that we have a typo, I propose "have coreboot execute it" rather
than "have coreboot executes it". Otherwise, all good for me.

neox: acking, provided typo "have coreboot executes it" is corrected
Acked-by: Adrien 'neox' Bourmault <neox@gnu.org>

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part