[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: [Gnucap-devel] Fwd: common_component and eval_bm_acton_base

From: al davis
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Gnucap-devel] Fwd: common_component and eval_bm_acton_base
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:06:48 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-trunk-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )

On Monday 08 November 2010, address@hidden wrote:
> ad> This is incorrect because EVAL_BM_MODEL contains no
> information,  ad> only placeholders.  The correct values are
> in the daughter ad> object, which would be wiped out when
> the placeholder is copied ad> over it.
> May be we speak about different things.
> I speak about _temp_c value (as an example).
> It is initialized for EVAL_BM_MODEL during precalc_first()
> and then it is lost when EVAL_BM_MODEL is converted into
> EVAL_BM_SEMI_RESISTOR during expand().
> please test that.

I don't see it.

_temp_c in EVAL_BM_MODEL is not used, because EVAL_BM_MODEL is 
only a placeholder.

The test cases I have show that the parameters are evaluated 

Can you post a test case that illustrates the problem?

Attachment: bmm_res.3p.ckt
Description: Text document

Attachment: bmm_res.2p.ckt
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]