[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnucap-devel] prototype name -- bug or feature?

From: Felix Salfelder
Subject: Re: [Gnucap-devel] prototype name -- bug or feature?
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:58:24 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:52:15PM +0100, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> i don't know. but is this a verilog issue? potentially some or other
> language plugin might want to (dis)allow bogus declarations, so
> find_looking_out should make it optional. i think, optionally just
> returning cards if !is_device(), would at least solve my problem.

while i'm at it: i've now implemented
const CARD* find_card(string name, CARD_LIST* Scope, bool nondevice=0);
in LANGUAGE as follows.

const CARD* LANGUAGE::find_card(string name, CARD_LIST* Scope, bool nondevice) {
  if (!Scope) Scope = &CARD_LIST::card_list;
  CARD_LIST::const_iterator i = Scope->find_(name);
    while (i!=Scope->end()) {
      if((*i)->is_device()){ untested();
        i = Scope->find_again(name, ++i); // skip
      } else {
  if (i == Scope->end()) {
    throw Exception_Cant_Find(name, "scope");
  return *i;

i've changed the find_ call in LANGUAGE::find_proto to
try {
        p = find_card( Name, &CARD_LIST::card_list, !OPT::bogus );
} catch(Exception_Cant_Find) {

if there's really a language that does conditional bogus instanciations,
nondevice needs to be changed to prefer_nondevice... i'll leave it like
this for now.

have fun

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]