[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnucap-devel] dc command

From: al davis
Subject: Re: [Gnucap-devel] dc command
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:26:05 -0400
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )

On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> also, the initial op has control 1, not 0 (1=scUSER looks
> better to me), so the tests still 'fail'.

That's what I meant by "questionable" .. different but not 
necessarily wrong.

The old code didn't have that feature, so dc had stepcause 
always 0.

On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> > Questionable regressions:
> > Some tests, most notably trcurve*, give different
> > results.  At  first glance, the differences seem
> > insignificant, might be an improvement, but this needs to
> > be explained.
> the initial guess is different. in non pathological cases
> this guess it closer, but that doesnt mean the accepted
> solution will be better...

need to examine closely.  Likely, new and old could be equally 
good, both within tolerance, so the regression test just says 
that something changed.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]