[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnucap-devel] plugin plans, -I
From: |
Felix Salfelder |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnucap-devel] plugin plans, -I |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:39:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:07:21AM -0500, al davis wrote:
> but I do as much of that as I can with plugins, out of tree.
i'd be better off without 'variants' (and just plugins). just not there
yet.
> gnucap-uf is static linked, old pre-split configuration.
some plugins are compiled in mainly because of the s_dc output plugin
linkage problem. this blocks the switch to libgnucap.so and plugins.so
(this is really bad). i dont know how the output plugins are meant to
look like...
but not all plugins are compiled in. the architecture of -uf is still
the same, nevermind the file locations. the relevant parts have been
backported to the "autotools" branch. what i wrote about include
paths/variants etc. still applies there.
> Now, lib, main, modelgen, and plugins (apps directory) are
> considered separate, asynchronous.
same with "modules" in gnucap-uf, though most plugins are singled
out and part of extra packages.
cheers
felix
PS: i was wondering whether a symlink ${srcdir}/include/gnucap -> .
might reduce the headache of #include "gnucap/header.h". well, it feels
suboptimal, doesn't it?
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] plugin plans, (continued)
Re: [Gnucap-devel] plugin plans, Felix Salfelder, 2015/02/10
Re: [Gnucap-devel] plugin plans, al davis, 2015/02/13