[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnucap-devel] libtool?
From: |
Felix Salfelder |
Subject: |
[Gnucap-devel] libtool? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:00:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:54:10AM -0400, al davis wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:39:30 +0200
> Felix Salfelder <address@hidden> wrote:
> > this is along the lines of porting autotools features to the Make{1,2,3}
> > files. it is meant to work for everyone, and the packaging will become
> > more straightforward... what do you think?
>
> Try it, in a branch, so I can see it.
Hi Al.
see the libtool branch.
some notes:
- i have no idea, what the cross-platform implications are. and i don't
know, how the build system is meant to work, hence i tried to add this
*as an option* first.
- there's one option "--prefix" already. the --with-libtool flag and its
data flow is aligned to that. i don't know how sucessful this is.
- most parts are implemented various times. it might make some sense to
deduplicate. i tried not to.
- libtool raises portability issues upon linking plain object files into
a libtool library. hence i added a rule to compile .lo (libtool
object) instead.
- the library version is initialized to 0:0:0. we should probably agree
on a higher one...
if this is working for you, we might want to include libtool, and
default to --with-libtool, maybe just remove the non-libtool
implementation... later.
cheers
felix
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Gnucap-devel] libtool?,
Felix Salfelder <=