Re: [Gnucap-devel] "crash" branch

[Al Arduengo]

Please delete address@hidden from your mail list. He passed away in April 2018. 

~ Sarah

Sent from my iPhone, so please forgive typos and brevity. 

> On Jul 30, 2018, at 6:04 AM, Felix Salfelder <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:09:07PM -0400, al davis wrote:
>> The failed assert probably could be commented out.  Not removed, but
>> commented out.  A commented out assert means "this really should be
>> true, but sometimes it isn't".
> 
> Thanks for giving the background. Yes, it's not a real problem.
> 
> I was thinking about adding an error(..., "logic race in %s", label);,
> so one can actually see the commented out assertion..
> 
> i am trying to make the logic more verilog friendly (accessible, to
> begin with). This is required for gnucsator, because a global logic
> modelcard does not play with gate parameters, and local modelcards do
> not connect properly ("different logic models used..."). the "logic"
> branch fixes this.
> 
> somewhat lower priority: i'd be happy to implement the logic+subckt
> models without the lang_spice hacks. do you have any particular
> (non-spice) representation in mind? does it exist?
> 
> cheers
> felix
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnucap-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel