[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?
From: |
John Culleton |
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use? |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:46:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:57:02 pm Duke Normandin wrote:
> Should a COBOL noob like me be learning the language using the
> traditional (strict) formatting conventions in order to learn
> COBOL correctly, or is using the "free" source format OK in this
> day-and-age?
>
> I was even thinking of using some sort of template, like:
>
> 000100*A---B--+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+
>----7-- 000200 ID DIVISION.
> 000300 PROGRAM-ID. MY_PROG.
> 000400 AUTHOR. Duke.
> 000500 DATA DIVISION.
> 000600 WORKING-STORAGE SECTION.
> 000700
> 000800
> 000900
> 001000
> 001100
> 001200 PROCEDURE DIVISION.
> 001300 MAIN-PARA.
I have a template program like that. I even have a program that
will renumber a program like that. But I learned COBOL in 1968 :<)
--
John Culleton
Create Book Covers with Scribus/e-book $5.95
http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, (continued)
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, David Essex, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, Duke Normandin, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, David Essex, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, Duke Normandin, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, John Culleton, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, John Culleton, 2009/08/07
Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, Gary Cutler, 2009/08/05
Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?,
John Culleton <=