[gnugo-devel] Re: 3.1.32: -Wshadow fixes in reading.c

[Teun Burgers]

Gunnar Farneback wrote:

> Of course uniqueness is good, but it's not worth the price if the
> alternative is harder to read variables. The proposed five letter loop
> variables in the *_CANDIDATE_MOVE macros make the code much harder to
> read than a little shadowing does.

Something less verbose is fine with me. l_acm->la, l_rcm->lr?
If you prefer l, also fine.

Teun