[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] arend_3_3.3: 1st step reading.c cleanup
From: |
Arend Bayer |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] arend_3_3.3: 1st step reading.c cleanup |
Date: |
Sat, 18 May 2002 01:47:35 +0200 (CEST) |
> - function naming consistency in reading.c
>
I realized that I forgot some more functions that should be called
.._moves, too. When I started to fix this, I ran into doing some more
clean-up. Would it be consensus to remove the cache lookups from
attack1234/defend1234? Caching is disabled for these functions, and I
don't see any reason why we would want to change this.
Also, the functions restricted_attack/defend are appartently unused.
According to the comments, they should be used to produce backfill
moves, which is done differently now. Should they be removed, or is
there a reason why they might get used?
Arend