Re: [gnugo-devel] auto generated regression tests

[bump]

> Dan wrote:
> > Then since we have a field called dragon_status that is probably
> > not a good name for this gtp function. 
> 
> No, we don't. We have fields called owl_status, matcher_status, and
> status.

Right, it's not called dragon_status but dragon->status.

> I propose the following change of field names in struct dragon_data:
> 
> status -> crude_status
> matcher_status -> status
> 
> to better reflect their current use. Then the meaning of the different
> status field becomes:

I was thinking along the same lines.

> Or put in other words both positions are mannenko with the difference
> that in the upper diagram both players can make seki but in the lower
> diagram only white.
> 
> To me it looks like the upper diagram is clearly better for black and
> hence that A17 is the correct move.
> 
> Am I missing something?

No, it looks like you are right, A17 gives B the option of
making seki so it is the correct move. Quite an instructive
position.

Dan