Re: [gnugo-devel] Strategic penalty and invasions

[bump]

> I propose the following scheme:
> e: extending moves which are safely connected to a living dragon.
> E: loose moves which extend from a living dragon without a safe connection
> I: invasion moves without direct support from own living stones
> 
> An E classification would overrule I and e would overrule both E and
> I.
> 
> Does this scheme make sense and look useful?

If I understand you e/E/I is a pattern classification but
there would be a corresponding field in move_data.

This sounds good.

Dan