[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gnugo-devel] Bugfix
From: |
Portela Fernand |
Subject: |
[gnugo-devel] Bugfix |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 07:47:02 +0100 |
Hi,
I guess something got forgotten in D509. The question is, since the
pattern was disabled due to the bug, is it worth re-enabling it ?
/nando
Index: patterns/owl_defendpats.db
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gnugo/gnugo/patterns/owl_defendpats.db,v
retrieving revision 1.71
diff -u -r1.71 owl_defendpats.db
--- patterns/owl_defendpats.db 5 Nov 2002 16:28:21 -0000 1.71
+++ patterns/owl_defendpats.db 10 Nov 2002 06:52:05 -0000
@@ -1677,6 +1677,8 @@
Pattern D509
# FIXME: (see trevor:360)
+# nn Fixed constraint (3.3.12)
+# does_defend() doesn't return WIN
XO? capture to defend
*XO
@@ -1688,7 +1690,7 @@
*XO
---
-;does_defend(*,a) == WIN
+;does_defend(*,a)
Pattern D510
- [gnugo-devel] Bugfix,
Portela Fernand <=
- RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/10
- [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Paul Pogonyshev, 2002/11/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, bump, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Paul Pogonyshev, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/30