[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Tests
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Tests |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Mar 2003 10:34:24 -0800 |
> Evan wrote:
> +loadsgf games/nngs/juka-gnugo-3.3.16-200303031959.sgf 4
> +440 gg_genmove black
> +#? [D5]
>
> F4 should also be playable.
This test is identical to ninestones:300. Although F4 is
playable for a strong player I think GNU Go shouldn't do it.
> +#The cut looks bigger to me
> +loadsgf games/nngs/juka-gnugo-3.3.16-200303031959.sgf 56
> +460 gg_genmove black
> +#? [B14]
>
> B14 isn't all that large (white can jump to E18). Blocking around D18
> looks bigger, but it may well be better to put pressure on G6.
This move doesn't seem worth regressing over.
+loadsgf games/nngs/juka-gnugo-3.3.16-200303031959.sgf 20
+450 restricted_genmove black E6 B5
+#? [E6]
A good test.
+loadsgf games/nngs/juka-gnugo-3.3.16-200303031959.sgf 80
+480 gg_genmove black
+#? [S6|Q3|P4]
The game move seems good to me. It is true that W captured
two stones but S8 prevents a world of problems on the side.
+loadsgf games/nngs/juka-gnugo-3.3.16-200303031959.sgf 92
+490 restricted_genmove black T1 E6
+#? [E6]
A good test. Maybe we should make this an ordinary genmove
and ask that GNU plays O8.
+loadsgf games/nngs/juka-gnugo-3.3.16-200303031959.sgf 126
+500 gg_genmove black
+#? [F16]
+
+loadsgf games/nngs/juka-gnugo-3.3.16-200303031959.sgf 142
+510 gg_genmove black
+#? [Q11|Q12|Q13|P13]
Both big but not as bad as other moves in the same game.
I'd leave these tests out.
+loadsgf games/nngs/juka-gnugo-3.3.16-200303031959.sgf 204
+520 gg_genmove black
+#? [N10]
A good test.