[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] 2 little things
From: |
Arend Bayer |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] 2 little things |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:58:47 +0100 (CET) |
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, max-d wrote:
> 1...
> i have noticed that gnugo takes a relative large amount of time when it
> executes the "undo" command (vs the "play" command ).
> I suppose there are some good reasons for that but i wonder about them and i
> would like to be sure there is no imperfection in the *undo function*
> implementation since this fact makes some troubles to me.
What means relatively large? It's certainly not considered a performance
relevant, but it shouldn't take ages (i.e. seconds) either.
> 2...
> it would be nice if the last stable version (3.2) could be rebuilt (updated)
> in order to allow it to understand the same gtp commands as 3.3.16
> i don't think this is very much work and this would be very useful in order
> to easily compare 3.3.x ad further with 3.2.
If you like, you can go the other way round by using 3.3.16 with
--gtp-version=1. But where did you run into incompatibilities?
Arend
- [gnugo-devel] worms from try_move, kevin yong, 2003/03/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] worms from try_move, Gunnar Farneback, 2003/03/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] worms from try_move, kevin yong, 2003/03/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] worms from try_move, Arend Bayer, 2003/03/23
- [gnugo-devel] 2 little things, max-d, 2003/03/23
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 2 little things,
Arend Bayer <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 2 little things, max-d, 2003/03/23
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 2 little things, Arend Bayer, 2003/03/23
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 2 little things, max-d, 2003/03/23
- Re: [gnugo-devel] worms from try_move, Gunnar Farneback, 2003/03/23
[gnugo-devel] do some work for gnugo, kevin yong, 2003/03/25