[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Joseki variations question
From: |
Arend Bayer |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Joseki variations question |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:05:54 +0100 (CET) |
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Evan Berggren Daniel wrote:
> I noticed a problem in the game gnugo-3.3.17-ylamaki-200303262305.sgf. At
> move 9, the position is:
>
> A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T
> 19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
> 18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
> 17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
> 16 . . . X . . . . . + . . . . . X . . . 16
> 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
> 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
> 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
> 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
> 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
> 10 . . . + . . . . . + . . . . . + . . . 10
> 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
> 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
> 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
> 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
> 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . . 5
> 4 . . . X . . . . . + O . . . X O . . . 4
> 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . X O . . 3
> 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
> 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
> A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T
Objectively, Q2 is the only move here. For GNU Go, I'd also be somewhat
satisfied iwth Q6.
I think this position is too rare to make this worth a variation in the
joseki database. Instead, we should teach GNU Go to understand that the
lower right is extremely urgent. There are many similar but not
identical positions. It's certainly worth a regression test.
Arend