gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gnugo-devel] 3.3.16 tactic failure


From: max-d
Subject: [gnugo-devel] 3.3.16 tactic failure
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 22:53:09 +0200

91 gnugo3_3_16:    A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T
91 gnugo3_3_16: 19 . . . X . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . 19
91 gnugo3_3_16: 18 . . . . X . O O . . X O . . X X O . . 18
91 gnugo3_3_16: 17 . . O O . X . X O O . . . X . . O . . 17
91 gnugo3_3_16: 16 . . O X X . . X X O . X . . O + X O . 16
91 gnugo3_3_16: 15 . . . . . . . X O X X . . . . . O . . 15
91 gnugo3_3_16: 14 . O . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . 14
91 gnugo3_3_16: 13 . . . X . . O . O . . . . . . . O O . 13
91 gnugo3_3_16: 12 . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . 12
91 gnugo3_3_16: 11 . . . X . . O . . . . . . . . X . . . 11     WHITE has
captured 0 stones
91 gnugo3_3_16: 10 X X . X . . . . . + O . X . . + . . . 10     BLACK has
captured 0 stones
91 gnugo3_3_16:  9 X O O . . . O . . . . X . . . . . . . 9
91 gnugo3_3_16:  8 O . . . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . . 8
91 gnugo3_3_16:  7 . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
91 gnugo3_3_16:  6 . . O . . . O . . . . . . X . . X X . 6
91 gnugo3_3_16:  5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . O O O . 5
91 gnugo3_3_16:  4 . . . O . O X . X X . X . . . O O X . 4
91 gnugo3_3_16:  3 . . . . O . O X . . . . . . X X O X . 3
91 gnugo3_3_16:  2 . . . . . . . O O . . . . X . O . X . 2
91 gnugo3_3_16:  1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
91 gnugo3_3_16:    A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T


in this position white has just played J14

i ask GnuGo3.3.16 for a hint
it says :

F13=44.3
L17=23.49

then if i play F13 it plays M17 and scores +2 for black.
--   if i play L17  ------- J7   --------- + 23.5 for black.

seems illogical !
Maybe i am missing something about evaluation...


testing Gnugo 3.2:

hint for black after white J14:

m17,n18=61.61
l17=61.58

f13=50.59

seems better but...

after l17 3.2 plays e14 and scores 44 pt for white !!
----- f13 3.2 plays l17 and scores :16.5 for black .


can anybody (un)comfirm these numbers please ?

In any case , 3.3.16 has suffered some regression here .

is there a command which allow to ask the evaluation for
a *given* move ?


thanks ,
md.

here is the sgf file

;B[qd]
;W[dp]
;B[pq]
;W[dc]
;B[ld]
;W[po]
;B[pi]
;W[qq]
;B[hd]
;W[pr]
;B[dd]
;W[cc]
;B[fc]
;W[od]
;B[eb]
;W[qc]
;B[di]
;W[rd]
;B[nc]
;W[cd]
;B[ed]
;W[ck]
;B[pl]
;W[qe]
;B[qn]
;W[cn]
;B[mj]
;W[pp]
;B[ip]
;W[gq]
;B[lp]
;W[eq]
;B[da]
;W[gk]
;B[dg]
;W[gi]
;B[nr]
;W[ir]
;B[bj]
;W[gg]
;B[dj]
;W[qg]
;B[rh]
;W[rg]
;B[jp]
;W[bf]
;B[bh]
;W[bk]
;B[oq]
;W[ro]
;B[rn]
;W[el]
;B[rp]
;W[qo]
;B[rq]
;W[qp]
;B[rr]
;W[no]
;B[nn]
;W[gn]
;B[pb]
;W[qb]
;B[ob]
;W[ig]
;B[qh]
;W[jd]
;B[je]
;W[kj]
;B[lk]
;W[ic]
;B[id]
;W[jc]
;B[ke]
;W[lb]
;B[ma]
;W[gb]
;B[hc]
;W[hb]
;B[ak]
;W[al]
;B[aj]
;W[bm]
;B[hq]
;W[hr]
;B[gp]
;W[fp]
;B[kb]
;W[ie]
;B[he]
;W[if]
;B[bb]
;W[jb]
;B[ef]
;W[kc]
)






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]