test case fix, was Re: [gnugo-devel] tuning patch

[Martin Holters]

> > Furthermore, I suspect that the move R3 which is now generated for
> > ld_owl:410 is valid, but the test requires T2. Could someone
> > double-check this?
> 
> Yes, that is right. (If you get "1 R3", that is.) Btw, R3 in ld_owl:412
> doesn't make sense (illegal move) so probably someone added R3 to the
> wrong test.

Almost forgot about it, but here is the respective patch.

Index: regression/ld_owl.tst
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gnugo/gnugo/regression/ld_owl.tst,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.33 ld_owl.tst
--- regression/ld_owl.tst       29 Nov 2003 08:56:32 -0000      1.33
+++ regression/ld_owl.tst       20 Jan 2004 08:50:15 -0000
@@ -400,13 +400,13 @@
 #? [0]*
 loadsgf games/owl47.sgf 11
 410 owl_attack Q4
-#? [1 T2]*
+#? [1 (R3|T2)]*
 loadsgf games/owl47.sgf 12
 411 owl_defend Q4
 #? [0]*
 loadsgf games/owl47.sgf 13
 412 owl_attack Q4
-#? [1 (R3|T2)]*
+#? [1 T2]*
 loadsgf games/owl47.sgf 14
 413 owl_defend Q4
 #? [0]*