[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch
From: |
Paul Pogonyshev |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:55:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.50 |
Evan wrote:
> > +Pattern EJ102
> > +#spl 3.5.5
> > +
> > +?XX..
> > +.O*O. block is mandatory. Tenuki is disasterous
> > +.....
> > +.....
> > +-----
> > +
> > +:8,J
>
> Is a full J classification needed for these patterns? Is j or t
> sufficient instead? J classifications are valued highly enough that
> they can cause problems in some cases.
Maybe this pattern is too general too? How about adding something
like
!weak(A)
where A is the X string.
Paul
- [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, SP lee, 2004/02/22
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, Evan Daniel, 2004/02/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, SP Lee, 2004/02/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch,
Paul Pogonyshev <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, SP Lee, 2004/02/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, bump, 2004/02/25
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, bump, 2004/02/25
- Re: [gnugo-devel] New edge joseki patch, SP Lee, 2004/02/25
- [gnugo-devel] Owl failure ?!, max-d, 2004/02/25
- [gnugo-devel] OWL failure !?, md, 2004/02/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] OWL failure !?, SP Lee, 2004/02/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] OWL failure !?, SP Lee, 2004/02/26