Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game

[Paul Pogonyshev]

Gunnar wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> > Seems like `resigning.html' should be revised.
>
> So far resigning.html only discusses GNU Go 3.6. This case of
> resignation was added in 3.7.1.

Then it shouldn't be revised, right.

> > If this behaviour seems undesirable, we should also revise GNU Go
> > itself.
>
> Why should it not resign if all stones look dead and it can't come up
> with anything better than a pass?

I wrote "if."  Since Dan was surprised, I thought he might want to
change this behaviour.  I personally don't consider it bad.

Paul