Re: [gnugo-devel] regressions and bugs

[Emanuele Cisbani]

Thanks again for your clear explanations.

2007/12/8, Gunnar Farnebäck <address@hidden>:
>  > But in this case if we accept a failure we can miss eventually
>  > a bigger mistake of GNU Go if the result become for example
>  >
>  > 1 FAILED: Correct '1 1 (PASS|A9|C9)', got '0 0 F9'
>  >
>  > How can we manage this risk?
>
> One possibility is to include a relaxed test which doesn't check the
> move, using a regexp like
> #? [1 1 (.*)]

I'll use this workaround to refine the test suite STS-RV
and I will add a note about.

The file STS-RV_0.tst is already emended:
http://trac.gnugo.org/gnugo/ticket/41

Thanks
-- 
Emanuele
http://www.google.com/reader/shared/07971903590737268053