[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Skills classification -- proposal
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Skills classification -- proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:11:25 -0500 |
1) To make it easier to the user the work with the skills form, and to make
the skill form more flexible allowing to fill skills not yet listed at the
data base, the ComboBox skills fields (<select><option..></select>) were
replaced by text input fields (<input type="text">). Therefore users can
write _anything_ in such fields.
That seems like a mistake. If users can write _anything_ then it
takes human intelligence to understand what they say.
You asked to filter what is showed to the public (e.g. non-free
software references). We have to know what a skill is to be able
to block it. A good category is needed to block or not a specific
case.
That is basically impossible, right? You would need to understand
their words.
You could perhaps detect that it mentions the name of a non-free
program. For that you'd need a list of all non-free programs. There
must be thousands of those!
> * Almost-Free Software
> * Partially-Free Software
> * Non-Free Software
Do you mean to block too skills tagged as Almost-Free Software? Note that
Debian is tagged so. You exposed that it was right fill a job offer in
which
you look for Debian experienced administrators to do a mass installation of
only free packages.
I agree it seems better not to block mention of Debian as a skll.
> What does "free documentation skill" mean?
Say a user fill as a skill as "I wrote the GNU Emacs Manual". The webapp
can
tag such 'skill' as Free Documentation to allow it be showed to the public.
I think that is confused. "I wrote the GNU Emacs Manual" is not a
skill, it is an accomplishment. If you ask for "accomplishments",
people will give things like "I wrote the GNU Emacs Manual". If you
ask for skills, they will say general things like "Writing manuals".
Or perhaps "Using MS Word".
You don't have to worry about how to tag something
that people are unlikely to give as a "skill".
- Re: Skills classification -- proposal,
Richard Stallman <=