[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] gmBackendListener vs. gmDispatcher

From: Horst Herb
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gmBackendListener vs. gmDispatcher
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 07:03:00 +1000
User-agent: KMail/1.4.6

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:41 pm, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> b) Indeed there's not payload to NOTIFY. However, the name of
>    the signal is arbitrary. We may thus use convention to pass
>    around the appropriate patient ID: patient_change_XXXXX
>    where XXXXX is the ID in question. Listeners must listen
>    to patient_changed_(ID of current patient) then.

This is sort of a solution - for many cases at least, but not for all. I even 
already tried it last night. However, the backend should notify on both 
events - only that most listeneres would ignore what they are not concerned 

We still need to implement the "unlisten" then, to unregister interest for 
example in the ex-current-patient.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]