[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] are we too freakin' ambitious ?
From: |
Horst Herb |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] are we too freakin' ambitious ? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:03:39 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.7 |
Rejected posting to address@hidden
From:
"L-Soft list server at GPCG (1.8d)" <address@hidden>
To:
Horst Herb <address@hidden>
Date:
Today 19:17:18
You are not authorized to send mail to the GPCG_TALK list from
your
address@hidden account. You might be authorized to send to the list
from
another of your accounts, or perhaps when using another mail program
which
generates slightly different addresses, but LISTSERV has no way to
associate
this other account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you
have
any question regarding the policy of the GPCG_TALK list, please contact
the
list owners: address@hidden
------------------------ Rejected message (54 lines)
--------------------------
Return-Path: <address@hidden>
Received: from 203.109.224.216 by LISTS.GPCG.ORG (SMTPL release 1.0d) with
TCP; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:17:13 +1000
Received: (qmail 24631 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2002 08:05:46 -0000
Received: from pc-00096 (192.168.1.96)
by bifrost.gnumed.dyndns.org (192.168.1.1) with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2002 08:05:46
-0000
From: Horst Herb <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] are we too freakin' ambitious ?
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:05:45 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.7
References: <address@hidden>
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:01, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> I thought I was shamelessly going to profit from our good
> friends at McMasters (OSCAR).
[...]
> And, no, I don't think we are !
I had again opportunity to talk to David Chan in L.A. the last few days. He is
a extremely nice fellow, way too humble and modest for what he has already
achieved.
>From the user's perspective, Oscar is quite impressive and fully functional.
>From the developers perspective, I agree that it is different. Download the 50
MB whopper and have a play.
Karsten is right that the table structure is not adequate but then, they are
already running in quite a number of medical facilities! And their web
interface is the best designed I have seen so far.
The good news: David and I have agreed to start a "project" letting gnumed and
oscar exchange data, starting with demographic information only. Just to
prove that we can, and to start an example so that all projects within the
open source community should do the same, to establish a de-facto standard
for data exchange in the absence of a true standard.
My suggestion is to do it via XML RPC. I have already written a
proof-of-concept implementation during the flight, but I am tired and jet
lagged now and will submit it to CVS after testing it and talking to David re
comments.
Other options are SOAP and CORBA, for both I can deliver proof-of-concept
implementations cutted and pasted from others of my projects, but I do like
the utter simplicity of XML RPC.
Suggestions? Comments?
Horst