[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] New Zealand's Intrahealth

From: Elizabeth Dodd
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] New Zealand's Intrahealth
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:31:25 +1000
User-agent: KMail/1.7.2

On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:20, Syan Tan wrote:
> On Sun Jul 17 13:52 , J Busser  sent:
> >This product has been demonstrated to administrative and IT leaders
> >among health region and hospital administration and I am told has
> >piqued their interest.
> >
> >Does anyone know it well enough to have insight into any Achilles
> >heel(s) that it might have, as far as serving doctors well as an EMR
> >(I mean over and above my presumption that it's a lock-in license
> >paradigm):
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Gnumed-devel mailing list
> >address@hidden
> >
> I played with it a little about a year ago in a conference;
> pretty flashy I remember; a bit complicated when compared to MD;
> it has some templating features which remind me of CPRS,
> i.e. buildable forms ; no idea how it actually works,
> although one blurb said it had 3 tier separation etc..
> ? remote procedure calls to a server and remote objects
> (meaning methods and objects are marshalled, serialized, sent
> as a stream, and then unmarsalled into objects again, and
> fed via a stub back into a function call on the server.
> This is is not their doing , it's probably either COM+
> or java RMI, and may even be CORBA based.
> )
>   instead of SQL on the wire ( which still has a lot going for it,
> as debuggable with ethereal).

it does run on interbase.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]