[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling

From: James Busser
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:59:22 -0700

Clinician-verified technical abnormality could *potentially* unify the indicators.

The easiest implementation, however, may be to copy into the signed indicator the same value as was supplied by the test_org (in those cases where the clinician confirms the test_org's indicator) as it might be complicated and a lot of work to have the clinician setting different kinds of technical abnormality flags for different cells... unless we unify them all with a simple asterisk?

Are we entertaining the visual indication of technical abnormality only by a symbol in the padding, as I am wondering if italics could be helpful for those or if people find italics to make (especially smaller) text difficult to read on the screen?

On 31-Mar-08, at 6:51 PM, James Busser wrote:
Technically-abnormal "signing" could have 3 modes:

- confirm lab's defaults for all selected (suggest this be the default signing action) - overwrite all selected labs with "technically abnormal" (i.e. ignoring lab's indicator) - overwrite all selected labs with "technically normal" (i.e. ignoring lab's indicator)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]