[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling

From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:31:28 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:57:16PM -0700, James Busser wrote:

> In the case of the inbox, all results would be unsigned.
Well, currently, there is no inbox showing all unsigned
results so that's currently of no concern.

> Therefore, to 
> display a "signing hand" (or "not check mark") on *every* result would 
> make it harder to see the lab indicators. I suppose that if on opening 
> these results, all are pre-selected by default, it may be easy enough to
> - sign all, at the same time as accepting the test_orgs' abnormality  
> indicators
That'll have to be done anyway since a review requires both
to be set. Setting both abnormal and significant flags must
be done concurrently which as a whole is the whole act of
signing. There is not third flag for "this is signed" except
for the very existence of a review row.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]