[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Clinician call of judgement

From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Clinician call of judgement
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:07:10 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

> ************+
> Adrian, Liz, Richard, Horst, Jim, Sebastian ...
> What's your vote:
> - track one pair of flags abnormal/significant per result or
> - track one possible pair of the flags *per user* per result
> Now it is still fairly easy to change things either way. We
> will still optionally store regardless:
> - a comment by the lab
> - a comment on the result itself by a clinician
> - a comment on the/each review
> - the lab's abnormality indicator
> *************

Well, no one seems to care, so I'll go ahead and implement
it. It'll ease a bunch of related things, too.

Tracking one pair of flags makes it a direct one-to-one
trait of the test result meaning it could be folded into the
very test_result table.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]