[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit befor

From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save)
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:09:40 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:06:01PM -0700, James Busser wrote:

> Is it manageable to be added to the next database version, and what  
> options should be considered for making a revision > 0 visible?

I'll try to get narrative with revision notice into 0.3. The
journal will be fairly easy while the tree requires a bit
more of meddling with database views.

> I had been worried that colorization could be too distracting in the EMR 
> tree,
I agree.

> however if the problem list were collapsed at the episode level, 
> and if only some subset of the "open" episodes was exposed, and if within 
> an episode not all encounters would be constantly in view (they may be 
> scrolled out of view) then the "offending" (distracting) encounters may 
> not even be in view all the time. Thus any distraction by color, when it 
> would be for trivial changes, may only come into view when relevant. Is 
> this analysis correct?
It is correct but I'd still tend to shy away from colorisation.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]