|Subject:||Re: [Gnumed-devel] 0.3-rc4 released|
|Date:||Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:32:51 -0300|
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:07:39PM -0300, Rogerio Luz wrote:
> > > So, wouldn´t it make sense to make the devel database use diferent names
> > > than the "packaged" versions? Something like gnumed_v9-dev ?
> > Well, since the packaged version is always a released
> > version and the devel version never is a released version
> > there will never be a clash.
> Ok so if there will never be a clash then I´m ready to start GNUmed 0.3
You need to be aware of one fact, however:
In case a bug is discovered in what is currently thought to
be the final gnumed_v9 schema which is included in the
v9.rcX preliminary server tarballs there will then be a need
to "fix" that database. This will be done by some sort of
script changing the database to whatever it should be.
This is, however, NO DIFFERENT from when that need arises
*after* we release _v9 properly ...
I am 99.99% sure there will not be a need to change the
basic table structure which actually *stores* the data.
Anything that might exhibit a bug will most likely be in the
"dynamic" part - rules, triggers, functions, views - nothing
that really changes the data itself so the "fix" will be
non-modifying as far as the data itself is concerned.
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
Gnumed-devel mailing list
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|