[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)

From: Jim Busser
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:09:51 -0700

On 8-Sep-09, at 1:34 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 05:34:13PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

Ignored for packaging.

But would be useful in /usr/share/doc/gnumed-client/

Added in SVN.

Same with gnumed-client.conf.example which documents all the
conf file options.

But I left all the documenting comments in the used config files.
So what?

See, this is my same point about not putting in /doc/ files that are meant to be functional simply because they happen to contain comments or as a place to keep functional files inactive. Maybe I am being n00bie naive here but would this not be a better case to relocate the hook script (in future) in the tarball from




and in this case (if the hook script is not meant to go system wide) it could be in the tarball in


Would a suitable destination in a debian system be



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]