[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)

From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:38:03 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:09:18AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:

> >>why to place the tarball's (client) bitmaps in
> >>
> >>    /usr/share/gnumed/
> >>
> >>when in cvs they are at the same level as pycommon and other stuff,
> >>therefore why not into
> >>    
> >>    /usr/share/gnumed/Gnumed
> >
> >That's a packaging decision. If Andreas wants to change
> >that, no problem.
> I hope you guys know (but I figured to here make explicit) that I am
> not trying to be a pain...

Ah, no problem.

I was trying to give factual answers not influenced by my
emotions about previous decisions underlying them.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]