[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Feedback Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed Release 0.6.rc1

From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: Feedback Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed Release 0.6.rc1
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:39:35 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:43:45PM -0800, Jim Busser wrote:

> On 2009-11-30, at 11:47 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> >> (  ) Non-patient related ("only" however the "only" can be taken as 
> >> implied)
> > 
> > I knew it :-)
> > 
> > Anyway, we'd make that a wishlist item.
> What do you think about a text filter like what is available in Waiting list, 
> despite that I am not yet sure if it would be on category or type?
> Also for those items like Galactica and Jekyll that might get "deleted" I am 
> wondering whether a better term would be "reviewed" which could be a new 
> column and serve as the basis for one more filter. I  am absolutely sure that 
> as soon as anyone would start to use this feature, they would (per current 
> design) "delete" a message only to later realize that they still *needed* the 
> content and to require that they go back in through a future audit table 
> widget will present an interim obstacle.
> Can I suggest:
> - (wishlist) add "reviewed" column and replace the "deleted" functionality by 
> a "reviewed" functionality with auto delete (copy to audit) after 7 days?
> - in the meantime, what would be the select from query to display, from the 
> audit table for the inbox, the messages deleted within the past 7 days, 
> ordered by recency of last-Modified and could that be adde dot the built in 
> queries as say
>       find inbox messages deleted in past 7 days

Oh, feel free to specify any wish in a wishlist item :-)

Note, however, that well-constrained, perhaps even stepwise,
wishlist items are more likely to get implemented ;-)

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]