[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the G

From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:37:28 +0100

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Karsten Hilbert
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> However I think that it would be better to use #2 which is
>>       OBX 014 Date-Time of Observation (Test resulted by laboratory 
>> timestamp)
>> because it disambiguates (together with OBR 025 Result Status) whether an
>> actual result had been changed, and at what time that became known in the
>> lab, and can help us to not have to resign anything when all the lab did was
>> to resend us a redundant copy of unchanged information.
> Sounds right to me.
> Please document the above choices and the decision in the wiki time
> permitting.

 there's so much going on i'm keeping track of it.  i've also
mentioned that a decision on the merging of clin.lab_requests as well
needs to be made (which fields to use).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]