[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the G

From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:11:30 +0100

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Karsten Hilbert
<address@hidden> wrote:
>>  the only reason i overloaded encounters was because there was no
>> other way to preserve the OBR-OBX hierarchy.  place something in the
>> database that i can use and i'll use that instead.
> I do realize that and we will put something in the database. What you did
> there was fine for the time being.
> Now we need to find out what the OBX-OBR link IS in clinicians terms.

 i'm not really the best person to determine that.  i am much more
trusting: i can see that in the mirth spec files every single one
which returns observational reports has an OBR-OBX hierarchy.  i'm not
one for worrying about or concerning myself with the "reason", i just
"see the connection" and immediately move on.   you've noticed already
(sebastien even commented on it) that i move _extremely_ quick at
times, on coding up solutions: now you know why.

 but, yeah - i lack the knowledge to be able to reassure or tell you
_why_ the decision was made to specify that OBR-OBX should be a

 however i know someone who may be able to explain.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]