2011/4/18 Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:57:27PM -0300, Rogerio Luz wrote:
> > The hard part will be to support multiple coding systems per se, multiple
> > codes per health issue, multiple versions within a coding system and
> > multiple languages per one coding system.
> Don´t see why this is so ... let every locale download the code it neeeds,Sure, but that doesn't change the need to support several
coding systems :-)
Ok ... I understand it now
Which part of the encounter would this code apply to ?
> My idea would be something like this:
> 1) At the end of the current SOAP plugin there would be a separator called
> "Code" (or ICD)
- RFE (ICPC-2)
- AOE (ICPC-2, ICD-10)
- Soap (ICPC-2)
- sOap (LOINC, ICPC-2, ICD-10)
- soAp (ICPC-2, ICD-10)
- soaP (OPS, ICPC-2, ICD-10, LOINC, ATC)
I think it is a soAp
But maybe it would be better as a AOE (the summary right?)
> 3) When in the journal ou tree view the ICD would show besides the name ofOK.
> the encounter (for those who were authorized to see it)
Technically, the difference is between "1" or "any number of codes" :-)
> 4) I REALLY think 1-3 codes for an Encounter are more than enough, if not we
> can always open another encounter.
Ummm ... ok ... so we let it be any number ? including 0 ? This seems more vague, but easily more flexible to meet all needs out there.