[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ? |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 17:08:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 02:39:58AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
> @ Karsten, is
>
> dem.lnk_identity2primary_doc
>
> in v15 now obsoleted by
>
> dem.identity.fk_primary_provider
It should, at any rate. Thanks for pointing that out.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04