[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUMed SOAP vs SOAPless progress notes

From: Rogerio Luz Coelho
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUMed SOAP vs SOAPless progress notes
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:48:17 -0200

Why bother?

Could you just make the Note plugin with the the S in view and save it as a S in the backend ?

If the doctor doesn't use a SOAP he could be told his "narrative" will always be stored as a S and that's that.


2011/11/11 Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:39:51AM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:

> Richard got me to thinking when he wrote offlist
> > I've taken the approach in my software I aways would have liked gnuMed to take
> > - my progress notes are a plain sheet of paper - rich text editor,

There is no usable rich text editor available within wxWidgets.

> > and A4
> > page, no subdivision into restrictive categories like SOAP.

I should like to see evidence to the restrictiveness of SOAP.

It is about as restrictive as saying:

       Money in an account is either debit or credit.

> that as far as I can recall, GNUmed wishes it to be the
> clinicians' decision whether they wish to manage their notes
> granularly (splitting out S vs O vs A vs P notes) or whether
> to input their narrative as free-form.


> GNUmed could make this easier if it would provide a clone
> of the Notes plug in (call it SOAPless notes) whose right
> side would provide a single edit area.

Indeed. If someone were to write such a plugin GNUmed could
provide one. It might - behind the scenes - default the SOAP
category to NULL = NONE = administrative.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

Gnumed-devel mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]