[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUm ed 1.1.9 Maintenance

From: Sebastian Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUm ed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:48:57 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-13-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; )

On Friday, January 13, 2012 10:59:29 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:47:02AM +0000, Busser, Jim wrote:
> > On 2012-01-13, at 1:04 AM, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> > > I have added the missing pages to the output generator but have not
> > > corrected the dead links you spotted.
> > 
> > I fixed both links however remain perplexed as to the relevance of the
> > which appeared at Google, is that an arbitrary recopying for
> > the purpose of loading a honeypot?
> I have no idea what you are talking about but if there is no way to do
> the pretty same procedure as it was used until 1.1.7 I think you will
> waste your time.
> Whatever you do - please ping me when a new release tarball with fixed
> docs is available.  I'm not motivated to create a large patch to a
> broken tarball.
You will pretty soon see that the docs which will be packaged in a soon to be 
released (1.1.9 again or 1.1.10) are not broken any more. It all depends on 
what you expect to see.

images: they are there by design (from now on) so please package them
links: fixed
chat room javascript: offline user will never notice but if you insist I will 
find a way to remove it from html docs. I personally consider this a feature 
but since you are the packager you decide in case of Debian


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]