[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Challenges in lab test aggregation - panels
From: |
Busser, Jim |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Challenges in lab test aggregation - panels |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Sep 2013 15:08:14 +0000 |
On 2013-09-08, at 9:50 AM, Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 04:32:01PM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
>
>> But what about the tests which had *not* been aggregated
>> under a test type?
>
> The database acts as if they had their own meta test type
> defined. IOW, they are "linked" to a virtual meta test type.
> Each to their own.
Therefore …
1) a need for a designated common "base" unit, within meta test type (per meta
test type), to serve as an "arbiter" when the components of a meta type each
(possibly) had a different unit, and
2) if (1) is needed, then is it still useful to maintain within test_types a
separate "base" unit?
-- Jim