[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Sign as, or Sign?

From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Sign as, or Sign?
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:30:52 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:21:10AM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:

> At the risk of a triviality except it is so simple, the screenshot, can
>       Sign as
> in future be changed to simply
>       Sign
> as this avoids to create the hesitation whether such "signing" is only 
> supposed to be done if the value is Abnormal or Relevant?
> In the case of a Hb of 119 (relative to a lower limit of normal of 120) 
> whether I decide to mark it abnormal or leave it normal can be a separate 
> decision from my accepting responsibility for the result. Which, in such 
> cases, isn't even clear that the distinction is useful. (And could anyways be 
> computed.)
> … removing the "as" does not adversely affect the capacity to flag those 
> items where a clinician sees value to do so 

I have slightly modified the layout.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

Attachment: screenshot_001.png
Description: PNG image

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]