[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [Help-gnunet] how fast should gnunet be?

From: Jason Gilbert
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [Help-gnunet] how fast should gnunet be?
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:52:40 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:54:30PM -0500, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2002 05:22 pm, Christian Drechsler wrote:
> > were running several days. (well, ok, there was this "0 connected
> > hosts"-stuff (see below), so maybe there was no host available half of the
> > time. X-) )
> The 0 connected problem has been reported but could not be reproduced, 
> especially not when we tried to debug it. Any information on how to reliably 
> (and quickly if possible) reproduce it will be appreciated.

I've seen this problem as well.  Just haven't had a chance to try and look into
it.  The only info I have so far is that I'm behind a NAT'd firewall w/ port
forwarding configured.  The firewall box has a static IP so I have my IP
configured in gnunet.conf.  Changing HELOEXPIRES in my gnunet.conf config
appears to affect the amount of time it takes for me to drop to 0 connected
hosts.  When logging is turned up I seem to remember that there were messages
like every second or so saying that the IP had changed and trying to start new
sessions.  I would think this causes other nodes to eventually start ignoring me
Maybe it's comparing my machines IP w/ the IP in the config, which will, of
course, always be different in this setup.

Maybe I'll get some time to look at it this weekend.


"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former" - Albert Einstein

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]