gnunet-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNUnet-developers] Re: [Help-gnunet] GNUnet CVS branched


From: Arne Wichmann
Subject: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [Help-gnunet] GNUnet CVS branched
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:58:11 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

begin  quotation  from Ludovic Court├Ęs (in <address@hidden>):
> One day, 18 hours, 2 minutes, 4 seconds ago, 
> Christian Grothoff wrote:
> > I've just added a branch to GNUnet CVS for continued development of the 
> > 0.6.* 
> > codebase.  The HEAD will move on towards 0.7.0, breaking compatibility and 
> > being highly, highly unstable.  In fact, it is likely not to compile for a 
> > while.  If it compiles, it'll probably crash, if it does not crash, it will 
> > definitively not connect to the existing network.  You get the idea.  I'll 
> > post a note once it is safe to try things, until then CVS HEAD will only be 
> > useful for people that want to get their hands dirty (i.e., code).
> 
> Is there a place where we can learn more about the current plans for
> 0.7?
> 
> BTW, did you read the criticisms of GNUnet's economic model in [1]?

> [1] "Incentives for Cooperation in Peer-to-Peer Networks",
>     http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~mfeldman/oath/

I just did now. The first point I see is that the iterated prisoners
dilemma postulates randomized neighbours for each iteration. This does not
look too similar to a gnunet-like szenario, where iterated neighbours get
chosen using their history (at least mainly).

cu

AW
-- 
<ThePhonk> *tueteKlammernUeberVariableAuskipp* Dereferenzier Dich, Du
+Miststueck!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]