[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] ECDSA vs. EDDSA
|
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] ECDSA vs. EDDSA |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jan 2016 19:00:08 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 |
On 01/08/2016 06:45 PM, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> I'd imagine Christian may give a better or more specific answer, but..
>
> It's much harder to screw up using EdDSA signatures, so the code that
> uses them is more robust and requires less careful review.
>
> Afaik ECDSA is only used in GNS to accommodate GNS's specific key
> blinding approach.
That's correct, there is nothing for me to be add here.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature