[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] gentoo, last tweaks and questions

From: Christian Grothoff
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] gentoo, last tweaks and questions
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:55:34 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.6.0

On 04/10/2016 08:57 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> Well, 'bootstrap' is only needed if/when building from Subversion. Once
>> there is a release, this is no longer required.
> I have talked with lynX, and also gnunet devs afterwards, and
> I'll fix packages to svn numbers now as users will get a better
> impression with current release other than 0.10.1. When the next
> release candidate comes out I can include it in gentoo, but there
> shouldn't be much difference between release candidate and the
> time it was released (svn-number), or am I wrong?

Correct, so far at the time of the release, the release always matched
exactly some SVN HEAD revision.

> My personal experience of 0.10.1 vs 37011 and checkouts before
> that was drastically different, 0.10.1 has problems which are no
> longer existent in later numbers.

Yeah, about 300 or so according to the bugtracker ;-).

> I'll call SVN number 37011 gnunet-{gtk-}0.10.2_rc2 in gentoo.
> Maybe i can communicate the same with guix, we'll see. if I can't
> i'll still manage to express it somewhere.

That should be fine.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]