Re: [GNUnet-developers] womb / maintainers description rewrite

[Christian Grothoff]

On 06/28/2018 04:13 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> link in line 1 returns:
> 
> package: gnunet
> doc-category: Internet
> doc-summary: Secure, decentralized, peer-to-peer networking framework
> doc-url: http://gnunet.org/book
> gplv3-status: depends-on-mysql (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48)

Should be corrected to AGPLv3+. (or 'yes').

> activity-status: ok 201404008 (0.10.1, java-0.10.1, gtk-0.10.1, 
> fuse-0.10.0/20131222)
> 
> package: libextractor
> logo: /software/libextractor/extractor_logo.png
> doc-category: Audio
> doc-summary: Library to extract meta-data from media files
> doc-url: htmlxref
> gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48)

Should be corrected to GPLv3+. (or 'yes').

> activity-status: stale 20131223 (1.3)
> 
> package: libmicrohttpd
> copyright-holder: notfsf
> language: c
> doc-category: Libraries
> doc-summary: C library implementing an HTTP 1.1 server
> doc-url: /software/libmicrohttpd/manual/
> gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet-lgplv2.1+

Should be LGPLv3+.

> For 1 I propose to correct the doc-url entry, we already have a first
> initial state of https://docs.gnunet.org publicly accessible.

Sure.

> license status does only reflect the latest release (maybe its intended
> to be that way?).

No, it's just way outdated.

> libextractor is not stale in development.

And had more recent releases.

> lmhd had more recent releases I think.

Yes, 0.9.59 by now.

> For 2: Let us rewrite the text. I've seen that you were active at the new
> website with a small fitting description, and we should sync that. The
> current package description was adjusted by myself at some point in the
> last couple of years.

Well, that sounds like you know _how_ to do this, so please do! :-)

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature