[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] Archlinux AUR question

From: ng0
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] Archlinux AUR question
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 21:58:26 +0100 (CET)

As discussed on our IRC channel, it seems as if I misinterpreted the commit 
which made me contact you.

The systemd file was apparently just adjusted by one line, the original file 
was a file
someone of us wrote.

Since I am convinced we have a threshold of originality situation here (there 
are only
so many ways to write a systemd service).

Unless you have a different view within a reasonable amount of time for 
I will place the systemd file in the public domain (or rather ask xrs to do so, 
if it
seems reasonable to xrs).

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:04:28 +0100 (CET), <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi maintainers and contributors to the gnunet-git package in Archlinux (CC'd),
> we recently included a systemd service file based on (read: at the moment 1:1 
> the same,
> with an added comment of origin) your systemd service file in the gnunet-git 
> branch
> of the AUR repository.
> Since neither Archlinux nor AUR provide a clear licensing statement, and we 
> like to be
> on the safe side, I have 2 questions:
> 1. Of those CC'd in the email who touched the .service file in question,
>     do you give us permission to include and modify the file?
> 2. Out of curiosity and for future references: What is the license on the AUR 
> git repository
>     and the Archlinux packages git repository? No clear indication means as 
> far as I am
>     concerned that it is the default license for most legal domains (all 
> rights reserved).
>     We'd have to consider the threshold of originality though.
> Cheers,
> ng0 for GNUnet
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]