[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] about gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca

From: ng0
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] about gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 21:54:03 +0000

Christian Grothoff transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> You are right, the existing option should probably be changed to -f. And
> if someone hacks options on that script, adding -c for the configuration
> file and -h for help and -v for version would also be good ideas...

-f is already passed, we just would pass an additional -f which doesn't
change anything.
If we don't pass it we don't get variable expansion to filepaths.
I will make it default to -f passed, and opt out.
> On 3/7/19 12:34 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> > Fixing up a man page for gnunet-gns-proxy-ca to get rid of the
> > symlink I looked at the code again.
> > 
> > It seems as if the self-documenting output is a bit misleading
> > for people using it, or should be expanded.
> > 
> > gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca works without passing an option argument.
> > If we do, "c" is the "-f"/"--filename" of gnunet-config. To keep
> > a common vocabulary between the pages and the options, shouldn't
> > it be -f for gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca, or am I misunderstanding
> > the script?
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> >
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]