Re: [GNUnet-developers] reindenting the tree, choosing a formater

[N]

ok. I've never seen the email by florian which christian mentioned
to me. I'm okay with uncrustify.

Should I wait for more of us to reply or get to it today?

Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 2.5K bytes:
> Fine with me. I just tried it. Works great in vim just like clang-format.
> 
> > On 8. Sep 2019, at 05:45, Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > Signed PGP part
> > On 9/7/19 9:00 PM, N wrote:
> >>> Sure, assuming you're talking about using Florian's uncrustify style.
> >> 
> >> Oh? I thought we would be using clang-format.
> >> Do you know how much it differs in style? I've used
> >> clang-format in my hook. I can run uncrustify on the
> >> tree.
> > 
> > Given that uncrustify looks significantly better -- and also offers some
> > more flexibility (i.e. "leave as is") I think we should just go for
> > uncrustify _exclusively_.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 



> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature