gnunet-svn
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNUnet-SVN] r25615 - gnunet-java


From: gnunet
Subject: [GNUnet-SVN] r25615 - gnunet-java
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:01:19 +0100

Author: dold
Date: 2012-12-21 12:01:19 +0100 (Fri, 21 Dec 2012)
New Revision: 25615

Modified:
   gnunet-java/ISSUES
Log:
issues


Modified: gnunet-java/ISSUES
===================================================================
--- gnunet-java/ISSUES  2012-12-21 10:51:22 UTC (rev 25614)
+++ gnunet-java/ISSUES  2012-12-21 11:01:19 UTC (rev 25615)
@@ -348,3 +348,28 @@
   * is that the "greatest overlap common to all n peer identities and a random 
key"
     or the "greatest overlap between a random key and one of the n peer 
identities"? (should be latter)
 
+
+---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+* collisions are actually happening unexcpectedly often, am I doing something 
wrong?
+* if i don't hash the (random) hash again before using it for the bucket id, i 
get *far* more collisions. why??
+* performance is not that good, any suggestions?
+ * using smaller hashes / faster hash function
+* can / should I use alloca?
+* measuring time: should i do it this way?
+
+* introduce parameter "exchange frequency" for consensus begin
+
+* idea for consensus api:
+ * conclude callback gives list of consensuses, with peers in consensus and 
and an ID
+  * => not too much changed
+ * the ID can be used to to get rid of the excluded elements, something like
+  * iterate_excluded_elements (ConsensusId id, ConsensusRemoveIterator 
iterator)
+
+
+merge of gnunet-consensus-start-peers:
+* mailed sree harsha about testbed questions, said code in 
gnunet-testbed-profiler is outdated anyway, wants to merge them himself.
+
+
+
+




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]